The older we get the more we DON'T KNOW.
- We don't know why there is a Notice of Exclusion Application (ALR) in the Langley Times, Mar. 20, Page 5 for housing and there aren't protests, Town meetings, ugly letters in the paper and delegations to Council.
- We don't know why all of Willougby including the Events Center has been developed on good farm land and there were no protests.
- We don't know why we were accosted at the Co-op by people who can't even explain the issues of the Mufford Overpass but want folks to sign a petition against it. When they are asked to talk about it the answer is - "the Township wants to destroy our farmland, you have to sign it !!" My response was bring me some farm produce from that piece of property and you got yourself a deal. Otherwise I'd like a safe path of transportation from my home to ALL of the amenities of the community I live in.
- We don't know why our streets here in Milner have been "littered" with old election signs turned inside out and with "save our farmland" written on them. Are there any guidlines about roadside signs?
- We don't know why there is such a commotion about the worst piece of farmland and best crop of swamp grass in the valley when the outcome is likely improved land quality.
- We don't know how folks think that roads bring cars when ALL of the time ALL cars come from houses and we are putting houses on farmland every single day.
- We don't know why this community is so proud of being the "Horse Capitol" which translates into piles of horse manure on some (many) small pieces of property and yet we still rely on ground water. It is a tough decision ... remove a little gravel and fill it with nice top soil for good drainage OR horse manure on a huge amount of the land draining into the "public use" aquifer ... which to choose ??? ... which to protest ???
- We don't know why votes can be "re-done" and embarrassing name calling of people, threats, cheering, clapping and repetition of whining is an acceptable part of a meeting that appears to have explicit rules for some parts but not for other parts of it.
- We don't know why people don't follow the Golden Rule ... the Overpass may effect us here on our street in Milner with more traffic (likely not) but when we leave our house we become traffic on someone else's road and they don't protest.
- Mostly, we don't know how JIM McGREGOR (Langley Times, Mar.20, Page 8) knew exactly how we feel, think and approach life and wrote an article about it !!!!! THANKS Jim.
- We DO know the Council is for EVERY single resident of Langley and sometimes we are happy and sometimes we are not ...
Garry and Sherry Tingley
6 comments:
I bet the 'other' blog won't print this letter!
The overpass and farmland are tied together yes, but for me it’s a NON-politically motivated farmland issue.
* One day we will wish we had more farmland – food is good.
* The ALR in the Lower-Mainland/Fraser Valley has been eroded almost 6% since the start of the ALR.
* The overpass will erode approx 14 acres just for this start of a new major roadway.
* The overpass design makes future ALR erosion of Milner Valley in-use farmland inevitable.
* The ALR makes stipulations about farm land expropriation; but has no follow-through to enforce them.
* Once land is expropriated, Translink, the ALR and the Province (which are ALL really the Province) simply offer very low money for the land and don’t make any voluntary concessions to assist the farmers.
* We are supposed to be thinking “Green” but we just keep making more roads and overpasses…put your carbon tax where it belongs...
* There are over 1200 people on a petition…Im not even on it...
* It is a “better than nothing“ plan… forced on us by the Province because the feds won’t do the right plan… two wrongs make an overpass?
* This overpass is just one of a few to come...
And one point close to my hart, NOT my Politics, is Langley is a community built by the farmers, and I have seen firsthand what happens to Farmers when they are expropriated (How they are treated).
So well said!!!
Dear Farmer,
Thank you for stating your case without resorting to threats and other tactics that have been used by the Vocal 150. Perhaps if more people like you were involved in early discussions in 2004 and 2005, the outcome would have been a design that all sides could live with. It is my personal wish that farmers not be mistreated with any expropriation, but that does not minimize your firsthand experience.
The "so well said" was refering to the letter from the Tingley's. I should have been more clear.
Tingley endorsed Tricky Ricky last time around which makes this pretty emmbarrassing for his worse-ip.
Post a Comment